It’s a big move for Twitter - one that many people reasonably believe should have been made months if not years ago - and it’s useful to have what is so often an inscrutable high-level decision making process laid out plainly and publicly for all to see. ![]() Trump from their platforms after the Capitol riot in January, he lost direct access to his most powerful megaphones. Twitter’s explanation here offers a a rare totally transparent glimpse into how social networks decide what stays and what goes. When Facebook and Twitter barred Donald J. Bernie Sanders denounced former President Donald Trump in strong terms in an interview released Tuesday but said Twitter’s permanent suspension of the former Republican. Try as social media companies might to let algorithms make the hard calls for them, the buck stops with a group of humans trying to figure out the best course of action. Ultimately these decisions, as much as they do come down to stated policies, involve a lot of subjective analysis and interpretation. We find that tweets by President Trump are followed by increased uncertainty, increased trading and a decline in the US stock market. “Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings on January 17, 2021.”Īll of that is pretty intuitive, though his most fervent supporters aren’t likely to agree.“The mention of his supporters having a ‘GIANT VOICE long into the future’ and that ‘They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!’ is being interpreted as further indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate an ‘orderly transition’ and instead that he plans to continue to support, empower, and shield those who believe he won the election.“The use of the words ‘American Patriots’ to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for those committing violent acts at the US Capitol.“The second Tweet may also serve as encouragement to those potentially considering violent acts that the Inauguration would be a ‘safe’ target, as he will not be attending.“President Trump’s statement that he will not be attending the Inauguration is being received by a number of his supporters as further confirmation that the election was not legitimate and is seen as him disavowing his previous claim made via two Tweets (1, 2) by his Deputy Chief of Staff, Dan Scavino, that there would be an ‘orderly transition’ on January 20th.This is how the company explained its reasoning, point by point:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |